Commercial networks want out of kids’ TV

Commercial free-to-air networks are calling for the scrapping of children’s and pre-school content quotas, with dwindling young audiences and restrictive advertising making shows difficult to fund.


Ten Network told a parliamentary hearing on Thursday that children are no longer watching its kids’ programs, with Ten’s audience of five to 12-year-olds usually at around 2,000.

Instead, kids are turning to the ABC’s dedicated children’s channel and iView, Foxtel’s children’s channels, Netflix Kids and YouTube, Ten chief executive Paul Anderson said.

Kids’ programs are almost impossible to monetise due to the low audience numbers and the restrictive nature of advertising, he said.

“With children not watching these programs, and advertising dollars not available to fund them, this content should be the remit of the national broadcasters ABC and SBS,” Mr Anderson said.

Seven West Media chief executive Tim Worner also told the hearing that children are more likely to turn to the ABC’s children’s channel.

“It is going to be far more likely that Australian children are going to go there to watch their content rather than find it in the isolated pockets where it is on commercial free-to-air television,” he said.

“It is neither sustainable nor defensible for commercial broadcasters to be required to spend millions of dollars a year on programs that are watched by only a few thousand child viewers.

“Children just do not watch children’s programs on free-to-air television anymore – it is something that just doesn’t happen.”

The broadcasters are also calling on the government to make its interim $127 million licence fee cut, delivered in June, permanent.

A key component of the media reform package announced in the federal government’s May budget includes replacing broadcasting licence fees with cheaper spectrum usage charges.

Both Seven and Ten said a permanent reprieve from fees would allow the savings to be reinvested into Australian production.

“We work hard at coming up with Australian programming which now must stand out in the crowd,” Mr Worner said.

“But hitting these goals requires investment and it requires Australian media companies to remain viable.

“(The package) helps us invest in a future where Australian stories are still a vital part of our lives.”

Bailey stood down on email ‘technicality’

The head of Queensland’s corruption watchdog says Labor government minister Mark Bailey has been stood aside over a technicality, rather than actual corruption.


The Crime and Corruption Commission has found Mr Bailey may have engaged in corrupt conduct in January by deleting an email account used to correspond with a top union official.

Mr Bailey used the email address [email protected] to correspond with Electrical Trades Union boss Peter Simpson last November, but deleted the account following a right to information request in January.

Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk responded on Wednesday by asking Mr Bailey to stand aside pending a further investigation by the state archivist.

Under questioning at budget estimates hearings in state parliament on Thursday, CCC head Alan MacSporran QC played down Mr Bailey’s conduct, labelling the finding a “technicality”.

“We had the emails. We looked at them. They didn’t bear out the allegation that he had attempted to use a private email account to cover up what had been discussed between himself and the ETU,” Mr MacSporran said.

“Because there was no evidence of that, what we’re left with is the bare allegation that by deleting emails, or deactivating the account, there is potentially a breach of the public records act.”

“Now that’s an offence, but in terms of its seriousness in the scheme of things, that’s not a serious allegation.”

Mr MacSporran admitted use of private emails by ministers was a “corruption risk” and was a breach of the ministerial handbook.

Opposition Leader Tim Nicholls accused the premier of only standing Mr Bailey down once “cornered” and presented with no other choice.

“These are serious matters. They go to the heart of our democracy. They go to the heart of people’s confidence in government,” Mr Nicholls told reporters.

“For six months this has been playing out, and (Ms Palaszczuk) has refused to stand aside or sack Mr Bailey, and indeed has only acted in a crisis.”

Deputy Premier Jackie Trad defended Mr Bailey, saying he had “more than excelled” in his time as minister.

“We have to wait for the outcome of the investigation, but I personally believe that Mark has been an outstanding minister. This has been an error in judgement,” she told the ABC.

The LNP opposition used Thursday’s budget estimates hearings to put further pressure on the government, asking Attorney-General Yvette D’Ath if she had ever used a private email account.

Ms D’Ath replied that she had used a private email account to print documents and speeches she needed for meetings.

A similar explanation was given earlier this month by Environment Minister Steven Miles.

Mr Bailey will be paid as a backbencher while the state archivist carries out further investigations into his emails.

Treasurer Curtis Pitt and Environment Minister Steven Miles will take over his portfolio responsibilities, with Mr Pitt to take charge of energy, biofuels and water supply, while Mr Miles will look after main roads, road safety and ports.

Labor cuts Rudd adrift over asylum seekers

Kevin Rudd has been accused of rewriting history as senior Labor figures line up to reject his claim that asylum seekers held in offshore detention should have been resettled in Australia after a year.


The former prime minister has complained he’s tired of being held to account for the coalition government prolonging a regime of offshore immigration detention which he initiated.

And while politicians bicker over who is responsible for those languishing in the island camps, refugees on Manus Island have learned they will begin leaving for the United States in October.

Marking the fourth year of offshore detention in Nauru and on Manus Island in Papua New Guinea, Mr Rudd argued his 2013 agreement was only meant to last a year.

“What Abbott did and what Turnbull has sustained is taken a 12-month agreement and made it into a permanent agreement,” he told ABC radio on Thursday.

“The bottom line is, these poor folks should have been resettled in either New Zealand or Australia or elsewhere three years ago.”

But Labor frontbencher Richard Marles says that wouldn’t have been the case.

“It is absolutely critical that Australia be off the table,” he told Sky News.

“What Kevin says now and what he tweets now is a matter for him.”

In 2013, Mr Rudd said asylum seekers who arrived by boat would have no chance of being settled in Australia as refugees.

Former cabinet colleague Anthony Albanese said the plan was for refugees to be resettled in PNG or another country within a year.

Immigration Minister Peter Dutton said Mr Rudd was either misleading the Australian people in 2013, is doing so now, or perhaps both.

He dismissed as wrong and deceptive the former prime minister’s claim asylum seekers would only have been detained for 12 months.

“What does he want us to believe – that somehow these people were just going to magically disappear after a 12-month period?”

Mr Dutton conceded he would have preferred refugees on Manus Island left sooner than October, with the detention centre closing that month.

“Our desire was obviously to have them off tomorrow; I want Manus Island to close. We’re still going to maintain Nauru,” he told Sky News.

“We have been caught up in the US process; they have a quota each year.”

President Donald Trump slashed the US refugee intake from 110,000 people to 50,000 and the cap was reached last week.

“Their year finishes on September 30, so we’ve now been pushed into October in terms of when people will move,” Mr Dutton said.

More than 1600 refugees have expressed interest in the US resettlement deal, which is expected to offer up to 1250 places.

Mr Dutton expects the US will take about 1200 people.

Decommissioning of the Manus Island refugee processing centre is under way, with a nearby transit centre being expanded.

Australia will stop offering help to refugees voluntarily returning to their home countries on August 31.

‘We have little or nothing in common’: What Menzies really thought of the Commonwealth

The documents show Sir Robert Menzies openly questioned the Commonwealth’s viability and accused new member nations of “thriving on antagonism” by waging a coordinated campaign of “anti-colonialism” engineered to strip “the white men” of their power.


The former Prime Minister also joined forces with former President of the United States John F. Kennedy to personally encourage the United Kingdom to join the European Economic Community, now known as the modern European Union.

So sensitive were the never-before-seen “personal and private” telegrams exchanged by the Liberal Party founder and British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan in 1962, the Secretary of the Cabinet warned they should not be read “by anyone at all” in the civil service, even instructing bureaucrats in Canberra to further limit their circulation.

‘Out with the white men’

“Any enthusiasm I had for the new Commonwealth is waning fast”, Prime Minister Menzies confessed to his counterpart in London.

“People like me are too deeply royalist at heart to live comfortably in a nest of republics.

“The new republics seem to thrive on antagonism.

“They appear to have less affinity with our own conception of freedom than they have with Moscow and Peking.

“In the depths of our being, we have little or nothing in common with them.

“For most of the new members, the cry of ‘anti-colonialism’ seems to be the raison d’etre of nationalism.

“For, as we see so clearly out here, ‘anti-colonialism’ means ‘out with the white men’.

Commonwealth leaders meet in London 1960. Getty

“Quite frankly I think we retain certain communities in the Commonwealth for inadequate reasons.

“To take a sample case, I can understand why Ghana wants to remain in the Commonwealth.

“In the hope of benefits.

“But it contributes nothing.


“The truth is that the Commonwealth, which used to have a structure and a spirit, is rapidly becoming a sort of tower of Babel.

“We run the grave risk of disintegration.”

Prime Minister Menzies complained about his “uncomfortably close” 1961 election victory, revealing a reluctance to travel to London for a Commonwealth Prime Ministers’ meeting.

“I must confess I did not enjoy the last two very much,” he said in the communication.

His reluctance was also because he said his “nominal majority includes one or two people who would be quite happy to make mischief in my absence” and he feared an extended absence from Canberra could see a repeat of his “bitter experience” in 1941, when he was ousted from office during a similar visit to Britain.

The Prime Minister also vented his fury at plans to discuss increased “movement of populations between Commonwealth countries” at the upcoming summit.

Former Australian Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies and former British Prime Minister Harold MacMillan remained friends, in 1968. (National Archives of Australia)National Archives of Australia

“If we were at liberty to discuss the internal racial policies of one member, it would be quite legitimate that at some subsequent meeting to discuss, for example, the Australian immigration policy which is aimed at avoiding internal racial problems by the expedient of keeping coloured immigrants out”, the Prime Minister huffed.

“We already have a mass of new members of the Commonwealth, some of whom have no real independence except political, and quite a few of whom are strangers to our notions of self-government and civilised administration.

“Many of us have great anxiety about the Commonwealth and the disappearance of so many of its old characteristics.

“They will be acutely increased if it turns out that we in Australia are to be told how we are to manage our own affairs.

“The plain English of it is that the new Commonwealth has nothing like the appeal for us that the old one had.

“When I ask myself what benefit we of the Crown Commonwealth derive from having a somewhat tenuous association with a cluster of republics… some of which like Ghana are more spiritually akin to Moscow than to London, I begin to despair.”

The role of war

Mr Menzies’ forthright observations appear to have struck something of a chord with Harold ‘Supermac’ Macmillan as he sat at his grand desk overlooking Horse Guards Parade at Admiralty House in London.

Having boldly told British voters they’d “never had it so good” and to embrace “the wind of change”, the last British Prime Minister born during Queen Victoria’s rule and to have fought in World War I painted a very different picture of the world in an uncharacteristically reflective and unsanitised reply. It was deemed so sensitive that it was only ever allowed to be seen by The Queen and First Lord of the Admiralty … until now.

Having confided that he too believes the Commonwealth has become “an absolute tragedy” with “young and inexperienced” nations “itching to interfere”, Prime Minister Macmillan then devoted nearly 18 pages mulling “the end of the white man’s accepted predominance”, offering a unique insight into the pressures of high office.

“My Dear Bob,” he began.

“I know you will let me just ramble on a little as if we were talking in a room together – how I wish we could!

“You and I were born into a very different world… and here we are, my dear Bob, two old gentlemen, Prime Ministers of our respective countries, sixty years later, rubbing our eyes and wondering what has happened.

“What has really happened is this.

“By folly and weakness on the one side, and incredible wickedness on the other, Europe has twice pulled itself to pieces in a single generation.

“I do not think the loss of life, terrible as it has been (especially since it always takes its toll of the best), has been the chief loss.

“Nor does the squandering of money and materials amount to much: these can be replaced.

“What has really gone is the prestige of the Europeans – British, French, Germans, call them what you will.

“Whether in the Old World, or migrated to the New World, or settled in Australasia, or in Africa, Europeans have broadly governed the world for over 2,000 years in a more or less coherent unit.

“What the two wars did was to destroy the prestige of the white people.

“For not only did the yellow and blacks watch them tear each other apart, committing the most frightful crimes and acts of barbarism against each other, they actually saw them enlisting their own yellows and blacks to fight other Europeans, other whites.

“It was bad enough for the white men to fight each other, but it was worse when they brought in their dependents.

“And what we have really seen since the war is the revolt of the yellows and blacks from the automatic leadership and control of the whites.

These are staggering personal reflections from a Prime Minister who so publicly embraced decolonisation.

A process, he wrote, had seen the death of “universal pride and confidence in the successful transformation of territories won haphazardly into an orderly Empire consisting of two great divisions”.

“Of these the first included the mother country and the countries of British tradition – Canada, Australia and New Zealand, and, with all the problems of the Boers, South Africa.

“Here there was no difficulty… there was the Empire of the free, independent, advanced, civilised, Christian people that you now correctly call the Crown Commonwealth.

“Then there was India.

“Most Indians, with the exception of a few agitators, accepted the need for a period of education.

“Thirdly, the Colonial Empire, spread over Asia and Africa, the Pacific and the Far East.

“Here the process of evolution to self-government had hardly begun.

“It was a matter of civilising savages.

“Nobody, certainly, expected that it would be what it has proved to be.

Prime Minister Macmillan appears not to have known – or to at least did not acknowledge – that Australia’s Indigenous culture dated back tens of thousands of years.

Former British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan watched from the sidelines as the United Kingdom formally joined the European Union in 1972. ( European Communities) European Communities

Debating a European union

Five years after France, Belgium, West Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and The Netherlands signed the Treaty of Rome in March 1957, the United Kingdom was still debating the merits of entering a political and economic union with “the six”.

“It is an uncertain future”, Prime Minister Macmillan mused in his dispatch to Canberra.

“Of Germany, you can never be sure.

“There are some fine men with good ideas… but there is always a streak of barbarism in the German people.

“It is the kind of smouldering fire which can easily be fanned up into a roaring flame.

“It is for this reason, apart from any economic question, that I have very slowly come to the conclusion that we ought, and indeed we must, try to have a political influence in Europe.

“I still do not know whether they really want us either economically or politically.

“For we may find that after all the whole thing falls to the ground.

“But if it does I do not think things will be better.

“It would be almost impossible for us to continue in NATO or keep large forces at enormous expense to defend a Europe that does not want us economically or politically on reasonable terms, and I would not be surprised to see comparatively soon not this time the Germans on the Channel ports but Communist-controlled countries.”

Sir Robert Menzies encouraged Prime Minister Macmillan to sign up to “guide Europe” on “political, repeat political, grounds”, confiding the President of the United States John F. Kennedy had expressed a similar belief to him that the United Kingdom was best placed to fight Australia and America’s interests.

During a meeting in Washington, he claimed JFK said to him: “You know, the interesting thing is that if Great Britain goes into the European community we will be outside of it and you will be also.

“In these circumstances, we both have a lively interest in maintaining and developing our own trade into the extended Europe and in the avoidance of over-nationalistic economic policies in the Community itself.

“We therefore have a lot in common and should be disposed to help each other to maintain and expand access for our good to the European Market.”

It was an approach Prime Minister Macmillan ultimately shared, but the United Kingdom’s application to join the European Economic Community was blocked, twice, by France.

He watched from the sidelines a decade later when Prime Minister Sir Edward Heath finally signed the accession treaty in 1972.

The late German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer signs the Common Market Treaties in the ancient city hall of Rome on March 25, 1957. (European Communities) European Communitie

Fake news?

Harold Macmillan would only spend another year ensconced in power and his long letter to Canberra revealed a political weariness.

“Our instrument of government was not created for the present day and is being subjected to pressures for which it was not intended”, he penned.

“Parliament meets far too long in the year.

“Ministers have no holidays.

“Although I have been away for a day or two to shoot or play golf I have not been away from the telegrams, the office, the boxes, for five years.

“And so we are terribly apt to deal with immediate problems and postpone the longer terms ones.”

In his reply, Sir Robert Menzies, who would go on to spend another half-decade in office despite his narrow election win, takes aim at the media.

“The great art and self-sacrificing profession of Politics is sneered at by the Press, whose controllers are self-elected, and the confidence of whose views is in direct ratio to their ignorance”, he mused.

“The business of a Cabinet is to think and to perform.

“But what time do we have to think?

“Cabinet meetings are squeezed in, and are rarely intellectually exhaustive.

“In Australia, the distances from electorates are so enormous that some Ministers have to chose between doing their Cabinet duty and, as absentees, losing their seats.

“Reading and thinking become more difficult at the very time when they are most needed.

“You are right when you say that our instrument of government is out of date – though I cannot think of a better one.”

Bellamy’s shares plunge as trade resumes

Shares in embattled infant formula maker Bellamy’s fell sharply as they resumed trading after the surprise suspension of a key Chinese regulatory licence for its newly acquired canning facility.


Bellamy’s shares, which were suspended from trade for nearly two weeks, dropped 34 cents, or five per cent, to a closing price of $6.40, after plunging by more than 12 per cent during the day.

The company this month completed a $60.4 million capital raising to fund the $28.5 million acquisition of a 90 per cent indirect interest in the Camperdown Powder canning facility and other parts of the company’s turnaround strategy.

However, following the July 7 suspension of Camperdown’s Powder’s food licence by the Certification Accreditation Administration of the People’s Republic of China (CNCA), Bellamy’s on Monday issued a supplementary prospectus to the capital raising offering refunds.

The infant formula maker said it had entered into arrangements with the underwriters – including major shareholder Janchor, which was founded by Bellamy’s chairman John Ho – to cover any withdrawals by investors.

Bellamy’s also said it had made full responses to enquiries raised by the CNCA about allegations received by the regulator from a third-party complainant relating to record-keeping and previous quality issues at Camperdown.

The Tasmanian-owned company on Monday said its sales and profitability had improved.

The company expects revenue of about $121 million in the second half of the financial year, and full year revenue of about $239 million.

Second half earnings before interest and tax are expected to be at the upper end of guidance disclosed in the prospectus.

Bellamy’s said it has been cashflow positive since March 2017, reflecting increased sales and an improving inventory position.